The Cost-effectiveness of Eltrombopag for the Treatment of Immune Thrombocytopenia in the United States.

PURPOSE: Eltrombopag was evaluated as a second-line treatment for adult chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in the 2006 Phase III RAISE (Eltrombopag for Management of Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia) randomized, placebo-controlled trial. More than 80% of patients reached satisfactory platelet counts within 2 weeks. However, the economic value of eltrombopag as a second-line treatment for ITP remains to be formally assessed. This study aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of treating ITP with a comparable thrombopoietin receptor agonist (eltrombopag vs romiplostim). METHODS: A Markov model was implemented over a lifetime time horizon to estimate the benefits and costs of each treatment. The model featured 3 health states based on current guidelines: (1) on treatment; (2) treatment failure/discontinuation; and (3) mortality. In line with therapeutic goals in ITP, model patients could experience 3 events: no bleeding, mild/moderate bleeding, or severe bleeding. Data on eltrombopag use were obtained from an open-label extension of previous Phase II/III trials, including RAISE. Romiplostim data were obtained from Phase III trials and an extension study. Lifetime overall survival was extrapolated by using treatment-specific mortality rates derived from severe bleeding and natural mortality rates. The costs of drugs, routine care, bleeding episodes, adverse events, and mortality were represented in the model. FINDINGS: Eltrombopag-treated patients gained 17.58 life years and 14.68 quality-adjusted life years, whereas romiplostim-treated patients gained 17.52 life years and 14.67 quality-adjusted life years. The total lifetime cost of eltrombopag treatment was estimated at $1.58 million versus $2.13 million for romiplostim. Sensitivity analyses supported base case findings. Deterministic sensitivity analysis predicted the greatest sensitivity to the rates of severe bleeding, discontinuation, and natural mortality. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that eltrombopag would be an efficient use of resources at a $50,000 threshold in 52.8% of cases. In all probabilistic iterations, the total cost of eltrombopag treatment was lower than with romiplostim, primarily because of lower drug costs. IMPLICATIONS: Clinical data were applied in an economic analysis, and eltrombopag exhibited economic dominance compared with romiplostim, driven largely by the reduced costs of primary therapy. This model was limited by a lack of specific patient-level data and robust data on the duration of secondary therapy, as well as by the fact that utilization values are likely conservative estimates for routine care use.

Budget Impact Of Eltrombopag As First-Line Treatment For Severe Aplastic Anemia In The United States.

BACKGROUND: Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is a rare autoimmune condition resulting in low blood cell counts across lineages. Immunosuppressive therapy (IST) has demonstrated low response, toxicity, and risk of transformation. In a Phase I/II trial, the addition of eltrombopag to first-line IST increased response rates relative to an IST-only historical cohort. METHODS: A model was developed to estimate the budget impact of treating SAA with eltrombopag-based therapy from a US private healthcare system perspective. A simulated cohort of newly diagnosed SAA patients based on the total US population received 6 months of IST ± eltrombopag and were followed for 1 year, with mutually exclusive patient cohorts entering in years 1, 2, and 3. The model assessed the budget impact of first-year treatment for each cohort without considering subsequent years. At 6 months, responders in either arm received maintenance therapy (low-dose cyclosporine), and non-responders received 6 months of second-line eltrombopag monotherapy. Costs considered included first-line, maintenance, and second-line therapy, administration, routine care, mortality, and adverse events (AEs). All cost data were reported in 2018 US dollars. RESULTS: The annual incidence of aplastic anemia was 0.000234%, with 83.8% of cases assumed to be SAA. Based on trial data, 94% of patients receiving eltrombopag and IST responded versus 66% of patients receiving IST, with a 0.3% reduction in the annual risk of mortality for the eltrombopag + IST group. Use of first-line eltrombopag in a model SAA population based on the total US population increased overall costs by $50 million over 3 years. First-line drug costs accounted for an increase of $69 million, while improved response produced $19 million in secondary therapy cost savings. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the analysis. CONCLUSION: High response rates combined with reduced rescue medication use and mortality in patients treated with eltrombopag and IST mediated higher medication costs.